KERALA RISING · FROM EXPORTING PEOPLE TO EXPORTING IDEAS here as a measurable design parameter, audited like any other outcome: leaderboards rank on participation rate rather than absolute volume, the field backbone logs on behalf of households without smartphones, and the public corpus makes any emerging skew toward the advantaged visible and correctable in the open. Chapter 22 sets out the full mechanism, because the risk of capture by the already-advantaged is as much an ethical question as a technical one; what matters here is that it is named, owned, and instrumented rather than left to good intentions. What we are most likely wrong about Worth noting: ending the risks chapter not with the risks we have mitigated but with the ones we cannot fully foresee, because intellectual honesty requires admitting where the framework is most likely to be surprised. Three areas seem most exposed. The first is the durability of motivation: this book assumes, on the strength of the literacy and Kudumbashree precedents, that social capital and rivalry sustain a behaviour after the loyalty on-ramp falls away. That is well-supported, but those precedents carried unusually strong cultural charge, and it is possible that some civic behaviours simply lack the resonance to sustain rivalry. If so, the affected programs will plateau, the assessments will show it, 269