Kerala Rising: From Exporting People to Exporting Ideas · Page 71 of 353

KERALA RISING · FROM EXPORTING PEOPLE TO EXPORTING IDEAS

KERALA RISING · FROM EXPORTING PEOPLE TO EXPORTING IDEAS
successful public-technology deployments in history,
and every one of them was an institution-owned,
reuse-built, publicly-governed platform rather than a
procured application. The civic machine proposed
here is far smaller in scope than any of them, a
single state, a bounded set of civic behaviours,
which makes its institutional demands modest by
comparison, not radical.
There is also a cautionary half to the lesson, and
honesty requires stating it. Each of these platforms
drew legitimate criticism, over privacy, over
exclusion of those the system failed to reach, over
concentration of capability. The civic institution is
designed with those criticisms in view: it is opt-in
rather than mandatory, it is governed by the dataprotection law that those earlier systems helped
prompt into being, it builds in equity safeguards
against exclusion, and its public corpus is the
opposite of an opaque database. The precedents
teach what to build and, just as usefully, what to
guard against; this book attempts to learn both
halves.
Why a new institution, and not an existing one
A natural objection arrives early: even granting that
an institution should own this, why a new one?
Kerala already has missions, societies, an IT
department, a Startup Mission, established publicsector enterprises. Why not hand one of them the
71