Kerala Rising: From Exporting People to Exporting Ideas · Page 161 of 353

KERALA RISING · FROM EXPORTING PEOPLE TO EXPORTING IDEAS

KERALA RISING · FROM EXPORTING PEOPLE TO EXPORTING IDEAS
Q. Does this favour big resorts over small
homestays?
A. The opposite. A small homestay with really warm
service can out-score a large property, because the
score measures experience, not size or marketing
budget. The homestay in Munnar that retrained its
staff climbs the same corridor page the resort is on.
Q. Isn’t a government hospitality score an
overreach?
A. The state already markets the destination and
runs the DTPCs; an audited experience layer simply
makes that marketing honest. Operators opt in, and
the score is theirs to improve. It is closer to a publicinterest review standard than to regulation.
What would make this program fail
Tourism Excellence fails the moment its score loses
integrity. If operators successfully buy ratings, or
competitors successfully plant negative ones, the
score becomes noise, visitors stop trusting it, and
the program is worse than useless; it has lent a
public imprimatur to a corrupted signal. This is why
the verification of genuine on-location visits, the
minimum-volume publication threshold, and the
dispute-and-audit path are not features but loadbearing structure, and why the institution measures
the health of the rating mechanism as carefully as
the ratings themselves.
161